Re: Add IS (NOT) DISTINCT to subquery_Op - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Add IS (NOT) DISTINCT to subquery_Op
Date
Msg-id 566B676B.70602@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add IS (NOT) DISTINCT to subquery_Op  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/10/15 7:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com> writes:
>> Is there any reason we couldn't/shouldn't support IS DISTINCT in
>> subquery_Op? (Or really, just add support to ANY()/ALL()/(SELECT ...)?)
>
> It's not an operator (in the sense of something with a pg_operator OID),
> which means this would be quite a bit less than trivial as far as internal
> representation/implementation goes.  I'm not sure if there would be
> grammar issues, either.

make_distinct_op() simply calls make_op() and then changes the tag of 
the result node to T_DistinctExpr. So I was hoping something similar 
could be done for ANY/ALL?
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: [GENERAL] pgxs/config/missing is... missing