Re: Request: pg_cancel_backend variant that handles 'idle in transaction' sessions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Request: pg_cancel_backend variant that handles 'idle in transaction' sessions
Date
Msg-id 563A7D39.1080402@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Request: pg_cancel_backend variant that handles 'idle in transaction' sessions  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Request: pg_cancel_backend variant that handles 'idle in transaction' sessions  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/04/2015 01:24 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I agree with Pavel.  Having a transaction timeout just does not make any
> sense.  I can see absolutely no use for it.  An idle-in-transaction
> timeout, on the other hand, is very useful.

+1 -- agreed

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Request: pg_cancel_backend variant that handles 'idle in transaction' sessions
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Request: pg_cancel_backend variant that handles 'idle in transaction' sessions