Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2015-11-04 22:14 GMT+01:00 Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>:
>
> > On 11/04/2015 01:11 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >
> >> I am sorry, but I have a different experience from GoodData. The few
> >> hours autovacuum is usual. So probably, there should be exception for
> >> autovacuum, dump, ..
> >
> > But autovacuum and dump are not idle in transaction or am I missing
> > something?
>
> last Merlin's proposal was about transaction_timeout not
> transaction_idle_timeout
I agree with Pavel. Having a transaction timeout just does not make any
sense. I can see absolutely no use for it. An idle-in-transaction
timeout, on the other hand, is very useful.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services