Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables
Date
Msg-id 563498.1693590101@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables
List pgsql-hackers
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm hoping to commit these patches at some point in the current commitfest.
> I don't sense anything tremendously controversial, and they provide a
> pretty nice speedup in some cases.  Are there any remaining concerns?

I've not actually looked at any of these patchsets after the first one.
I have added myself as a reviewer and will hopefully get to it within
a week or so.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding a pg_get_owned_sequence function?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: GenBKI emits useless open;close for catalogs without rows