On 10/29/2015 12:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Might be better to settle for configuring specific large tables using
> per-table vacuum settings, and not sweat the small stuff at a per-DB
> level.
indeed, since you ALSO need to vacuum the system tables occasionally, or
things go pear-shaped if you do lots of DDL.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
