Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
Date
Msg-id 560AF71C.4050601@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/29/2015 12:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> We could possibly add additional checks, like trying to verify that
> pg_control has the same inode number it used to.  But I'm afraid that
> would add portability issues and false-positive hazards that would
> outweigh the value.

Not sure you remember the incident, but I think years ago that would
have saved me some heartache ;-)

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!