-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/24/2015 06:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 08/23/2015 08:58 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> I think that's a good thing to have, now I have concerns about
>>> making this data readable for non-superusers. Cloud deployments
>>> of Postgres are logically going to block the access of this
>>> view.
>
>> I don't think it exposes any information of great security
>> value.
>
> We just had that kerfuffle about whether WAL compression posed a
> security risk; doesn't that imply that at least the data relevant
> to WAL position has to be unreadable by non-superusers?
So pg_config might be fully unrestricted, but pg_controldata might
need certain rows filtered based on superuser status? Do you think
those rows should be present but redacted, or completely filtered out?
Joe
- --
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=KZVU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
