Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id 5593FD98.7030602@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/26/15 2:53 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I would also suggest that if I lose this battle and
> we decide to go with a single stringy GUC, that we at least use JSON
> instead of defining our out, proprietary, syntax?

Does JSON have a natural syntax for a set without order?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2