Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id 5593FD10.5030706@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/26/15 1:46 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> - k(elt1,elt2,eltN) means that we need for the k elements in the set
> to return true (aka commit confirmation).
> - k[elt1,elt2,eltN] means that we need for the first k elements in the
> set to return true.

I think the difference between (...) and [...] is not intuitive.  To me,
{...} would be more intuitive to indicate order does not matter.

> When k is not defined for a group, k = 1.

How about putting it at the end?  Like

[foo,bar,baz](2)




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2