Re: UPSERT on partition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: UPSERT on partition
Date
Msg-id 558B509C.2010209@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UPSERT on partition  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: UPSERT on partition  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter,

On 2015-06-25 AM 02:35, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> 
> Inheritance with triggers is a leaky abstraction, so this kind of
> thing is always awkward. Still, UPSERT has full support for
> *inheritance* -- that just doesn't help in this case.
> 

Could you clarify as to what UPSERT's support for inheritance entails?

Thanks,
Amit




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_*_columns?
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing