Re: ORDER BY pushdowns seem broken in postgres_fdw - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ronan Dunklau
Subject Re: ORDER BY pushdowns seem broken in postgres_fdw
Date
Msg-id 5578227.HAYmEhll7C@aivenronan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ORDER BY pushdowns seem broken in postgres_fdw  (Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io>)
Responses Re: ORDER BY pushdowns seem broken in postgres_fdw
List pgsql-hackers
Le mercredi 21 juillet 2021, 11:05:14 CEST Ronan Dunklau a écrit :
> Le mercredi 21 juillet 2021, 04:25:00 CEST David Rowley a écrit :
> > Here the test claims that it wants to ensure that the order by using
> > operator(public.<^) is not pushed down into the foreign scan.
> > However, unless I'm mistaken, it seems there's a completely wrong
> > assumption there that the planner would even attempt that.  In current
> > master we don't add PathKeys for ORDER BY aggregates, why would that
> > sort get pushed down in the first place?
>
> The whole aggregate, including it's order by clause, can be pushed down so
> there is nothing related to pathkeys here.
>
> > If I adjust that query to something that would have the planner set
> > pathkeys for, it does push the ORDER BY to the foreign server without
> > any consideration that the sort operator is not shippable to the
> > foreign server.
> >
> > Am I missing something here, or is postgres_fdw.c's
> > get_useful_pathkeys_for_relation() just broken?
>
> I think you're right, we need to add a check if the opfamily is shippable.
> I'll submit a patch for that including regression tests.
>

In fact the support for generating the correct USING clause was inexistent
too, so that needed a bit more work.

The attached patch does the following:
  - verify the opfamily is shippable to keep pathkeys
  - generate a correct order by clause using the actual operator.

The second part needed a bit of refactoring: the find_em_expr_for_input_target
and find_em_expr_for_rel need to return the whole EquivalenceMember, because we
can't know the type used by the opfamily from the expression (example: the
expression could be of type intarray, but the type used by the opfamily could
be anyarray).

I also moved the "USING <operator>"' string generation to a separate function
since it's now used by appendAggOrderBy and appendOrderByClause.

The find_em_expr_for_rel is exposed in optimizer/paths.h, so I kept the
existing function which returns the expr directly in case it is used out of
tree.



--
Ronan Dunklau
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: add 'noError' to euc_tw_and_big5.c
Next
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: Micro-optimizations to avoid some strlen calls.