Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
Date
Msg-id 5560.1314393068@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> The "--section=data --section=indexes" proposal seems very reasonable to
> me -- more so than "--sections='data indexes'".

+1 ... not only easier to code and less squishily defined, but more like
the existing precedent for other pg_dump switches, such as --table.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: tsvector concatenation - backend crash
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only