Re: Enums again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Enums again
Date
Msg-id 5551.1131462535@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Enums again  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Enums again
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Huh, why not have the actual values in a separate catalog like
>> pg_enumvalues or some such?

> Sure, could do that. I don't have strong feelings either way.

I'd vote for the separate catalog instead of bloating pg_type.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload