Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>
>>Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Huh, why not have the actual values in a separate catalog like
>>>pg_enumvalues or some such?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Sure, could do that. I don't have strong feelings either way.
>>
>>
>
>I'd vote for the separate catalog instead of bloating pg_type.
>
>
>
>
Ok, consider that a done deal. Any other tweaks?
cheers
andrew