Re: Block-level CRC checks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date
Msg-id 5528.1259695072@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Block-level CRC checks  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Another thought is that would could use the MSSQL-style torn page
> detection of including a counter (or even a bit?) in every 512-byte
> chunk which gets incremented every time the page is written.

I think we can dismiss that idea, or any idea involving a per-page
status value, out of hand.  The implications for tuple layout are
just too messy.  I'm not especially thrilled with making assumptions
about the underlying device block size anyway.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Deleted WAL files held open by backends in Linux
Next
From: Scrappy
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4?