On 24/12/14 15:15, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 06:00:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> I noticed this when looking at the allocated shared memory structures in
>>> head:
>>>
>>> shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs Ctl: 0
>>> shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs shared: 0
>>>
>>> I thought we got rid of the idea that 'Ts' means timestamp. Was this
>>> part forgotten?
>>
>> Do you have a specific reference? That's not the concern I remember,
>> and I sure don't want to re-read that whole thread again.
>
> I remember the issue of using _ts and 'ts' inconsistently, and I thought
> we were going to spell out timestamp in more places, but maybe I am
> remembering incorrectly.
>
The change was from committs to commit_ts + CommitTs depending on place.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
