On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 06:00:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I noticed this when looking at the allocated shared memory structures in
> > head:
> >
> > shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs Ctl: 0
> > shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs shared: 0
> >
> > I thought we got rid of the idea that 'Ts' means timestamp. Was this
> > part forgotten?
>
> Do you have a specific reference? That's not the concern I remember,
> and I sure don't want to re-read that whole thread again.
I remember the issue of using _ts and 'ts' inconsistently, and I thought
we were going to spell out timestamp in more places, but maybe I am
remembering incorrectly.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +