Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)
Date
Msg-id 5496.1053980214@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> The reason it is PGC_USERSET is because we imagined people might want to
> increase the amount of information sent to the server logs, and we don't
> have an _increase_only_ restriction capability.  However, maybe it
> should be PGC_SUSET.

Yeah, probably so.  Particularly with the 7.4 error message additions,
it'd be possible to make the logs very verbose indeed, which might be
seen as a form of attack (or at least a good way to hide your traces).
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/sh