On 12/9/14 4:32 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 06:10:02PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> (For pg_upgrade you also need to do something about pg_upgrade_support,
>> which is good because that is one very ugly crock.)
>
> FYI, pg_upgrade_support was segregated from pg_upgrade only because we
> wanted separate binary and shared object build/install targets.
I think the actual reason is that the makefile structure won't let you
have them both in the same directory. I don't see why you would need
separate install targets.
How about we move these support functions into the backend? It's not
like we don't already have other pg_upgrade hooks baked in all over the
place.
