Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes
Date
Msg-id 548.1291763482@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> On 12/7/10 2:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Another point here is that it's not clear why we're selecting a
>> known-to-be-insecure default on OS X (where in fact all methods except
>> fsync_writethrough fail to push data to disk).  We've been around on
>> that before, of course, and maybe now is not the time to change it.

> Because nobody sane uses OSX on the server?

Some of us would make the same remark about Windows.  But we go out of
our way to provide a safe default on that platform anyhow.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: unlogged tables
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes