Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes
Date
Msg-id 4CFEB891.2030309@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes  (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/7/10 2:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Another point here is that it's not clear why we're selecting a
> known-to-be-insecure default on OS X (where in fact all methods except
> fsync_writethrough fail to push data to disk).  We've been around on
> that before, of course, and maybe now is not the time to change it.

Because nobody sane uses OSX on the server?

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: unlogged tables
Next
From: Cédric Villemain
Date:
Subject: Re: unlogged tables