Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Postgresql & AMD x86-64 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Postgresql & AMD x86-64
Date
Msg-id 5472.1055280904@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Postgresql & AMD x86-64  ("Martin D. Weinberg" <weinberg@osprey.astro.umass.edu>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Postgresql & AMD x86-64  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-advocacy
"Martin D. Weinberg" <weinberg@osprey.astro.umass.edu> writes:
> I didn't change the source tree at all.  I used:

> env CFLAGS='-O3 -m64' LD='/usr/bin/ld -melf_x86_64' ./configure --with-CXX --without-zlib

BTW, see Jeff Baker's nearby report in pgsql-general that s_lock.h needs
to be tweaked to use spinlocks on this platform.  If you're using
semaphores instead then you're taking a big performance hit.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Sean Chittenden
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM