Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Postgresql & AMD x86-64 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Postgresql & AMD x86-64
Date
Msg-id 200307082247.h68MlUG06929@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql & AMD x86-64  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
The s_lock.h change will be in 7.4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Martin D. Weinberg" <weinberg@osprey.astro.umass.edu> writes:
> > I didn't change the source tree at all.  I used:
>
> > env CFLAGS='-O3 -m64' LD='/usr/bin/ld -melf_x86_64' ./configure --with-CXX --without-zlib
>
> BTW, see Jeff Baker's nearby report in pgsql-general that s_lock.h needs
> to be tweaked to use spinlocks on this platform.  If you're using
> semaphores instead then you're taking a big performance hit.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Clay Luther"
Date:
Subject: C Triggers Cancelling Transactions?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Postgresql & AMD x86-64