On 11/19/2014 06:35 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 18 November 2014 21:19, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>> Personally, I see this as natural extension of the conditional block control
>> which we already have for loops with CONTINUE WHEN and EXIT WHEN. This
>> basically extends it to any block and it seems quite natural to have it for
>> me...
> That's a reasonable argument to include it.
>
> I seem to share the same opinion with Andrew: its not going to hurt to
> include this, but its not gonna cause dancing in the streets either. I
> would characterize that as 2 very neutral and unimpressed people, plus
> 3 in favour. Which seems enough to commit.
>
> Perhaps I misunderstand, Andrew?
>
That's about right, although I would put it a bit stronger than that.
But if we're the only people unimpressed I'm not going to object further.
cheers
andrew
