Re: Order of views in stats docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Order of views in stats docs
Date
Msg-id 545A9DCA.6010608@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Order of views in stats docs  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/5/14, 2:43 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 11/5/14 10:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> However, should we consider the possibility of changing the table to
>> straight alphabetical ordering?  I'm not as much in love with that
>> approach as some folks, but it does have the merit that it's always clear
>> where you ought to put a new item.
>
> Yes, I think that property is important when developing in a loose
> community.

Couldn't we just stick a warning SGML comment at the end of the list? ISTM that's no more likely to be missed/ignored
thannoticing that the list happens to be alphabetical.
 

Perhaps the best solution is to split the list into different areas; one for database stats, another for table stats,
etc.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Amazon Redshift
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Amazon Redshift