Re: pg_dump/pg_restore seem broken on hamerkop - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pg_dump/pg_restore seem broken on hamerkop
Date
Msg-id 5450EFE2.7070401@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump/pg_restore seem broken on hamerkop  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/29/2014 12:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> [Some more code and git-log reading later]  I see that the %z is a very
>>> recent addition: it only got there as of commit ad5d46a449, of September
>>> 5th ... and now I also see that hamerkop's last green run before the
>>> failure, on Oct 13rd, did *not* include the pg_upgrade check.  So I'm
>>> thinking this was broken much earlier than 0eea804.
>> Ooohh ... you are right, the first failing build involved not only
>> the pg_dump refactoring commit, but an upgrade in the buildfarm script
>> that hamerkop was using (from 4.4 to 4.14).  So it's entirely possible
>> this issue was already there and we just weren't seeing it tested.
> hamerkop is still failing in its runs done today.  However, I'm not sure
> that that proves anything about our hoped-for fix, because the commit SHAs
> it's showing on the buildfarm status page are still from Oct 13.  It looks
> like hamerkop has failed to pull any git updates since it was migrated to
> the new buildfarm script version.
>
>             


This machine appears to be misconfigured for git. I will email the owner 
about fixing it.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges
Next
From: Dan Robinson
Date:
Subject: Validating CHECK constraints with SPI