Re: Partitions and work_mem? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Partitions and work_mem?
Date
Msg-id 543EF442.5000206@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Partitions and work_mem?  (Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Partitions and work_mem?  (Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 10/15/2014 01:19 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> Sorry I don't understand what you mean by that. My understanding is that
> RedHat maintains fixes for security and other major issues for packages
> that have been EOLed. Are you implying that that's not the case? Or
> something else?

RH probably backpatches our fixes as they come out.  They did in the
past, anyway.

I just had the impression from your original post that this was a new
system; if so, it would make sense to build it on a version of Postgres
which wasn't already EOL.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Igor Neyman
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitions and work_mem?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitions and work_mem?