Re: PL/pgSQL nested CALL with transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL nested CALL with transactions
Date
Msg-id 53cf9370-1227-f86f-949e-0f5fe607aa23@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/pgSQL nested CALL with transactions  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/28/18 09:00, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I see. I thought "fixed" means you adopted the #define, but that's not
> the case. I don't think an extra comment is needed - the variable name
> is descriptive enough IMHO.

Committed as presented then.  Thanks.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Rangejoin rebased
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Function to track shmem reinit time