Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions? - Mailing list pgadmin-support

From Obe, Regina
Subject Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?
Date
Msg-id 53F9CF533E1AA14EA1F8C5C08ABC08D20197A1DF@ZDND.DND.boston.cob
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?  ("Obe, Regina" <robe.dnd@cityofboston.gov>)
Responses Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?  ("Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgadmin-support
<p><font size="2">> The source and slackware builds are automated on<br /> > developer.pgadmin.org. I've fixed
thesource builds which were broken<br /> > by a typo in a Makefile.<br /><br /> > The OSX build was an automate
buildrun by Florian - I don't know what<br /> > happened to that. I can probably run it on a box in my office if<br
/>> Florian's is permanently offline.<br /><br /> > The Win32 builds were never automated, and rely on one of us
to<br/> > remember to build one from time to time. Which we clearly keep<br /> > forgetting :-( I'll add it to my
list.<br/><br /> Thanks Dave - this is much appreciated.<br /><br /> Regina<br /><br /></font><p><hr size="1"
/><p><strong>The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be confidential, legally privileged and/or
exemptfrom disclosure pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you received this in
error,please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. </strong><p><hr size="1" /><p><strong><font
color="339900"size="2"> Help make the earth a greener place. If at all possible resist printing this email and join us
insaving paper. </font></strong><p> 

pgadmin-support by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?
Next
From: "Florian G. Pflug"
Date:
Subject: Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?