On 06/18/2014 09:12 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> No. Otherwise, one of those bits could get changed after a backend
> takes a snapshot and before it finishes using it - so that the
> transaction snapshot is in effect changing underneath it. You could
> avoid that by memorizing the contents of CLOG when taking a snapshot,
> but that would defeat the whole purpose of CSN-based snapshots, which
> is to make the small and fixed-size.
Ah.
Thankyou. I appreciate the explanation.
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
