Re: "Considerer Harmful Considered Harmful" categorized as Mostly Harmless - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: "Considerer Harmful Considered Harmful" categorized as Mostly Harmless
Date
Msg-id 5360F52E.10800@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Considerer Harmful Considered Harmful  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/30/2014 02:53 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 04/30/2014 02:35 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 04/30/2014 01:27 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>>>> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>>>>> ... so let's stop using that phrase, OK?
>>>>> http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html
>>>>
>>>> Shrug ... what I see there is a rant from a guy with no sense of
>>>> humor.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> 'pfffft', I say.
>>
>> I wasn't sure if the whole article was a parody.
>>
>>
>
>
> The rebuttal would be: "'Considered Harmful' Considered Harmful"
> Considered Harmful.
>
> Don't you just love recursion?

Nah, I'd categorize it as "Mostly Harmless" :)


Cheers

-- 
Hannu Krosing
PostgreSQL Consultant
Performance, Scalability and High Availability
2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "ktm@rice.edu"
Date:
Subject: Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Display of timestamp in pg_dump custom format