Re: Considerer Harmful Considered Harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Considerer Harmful Considered Harmful
Date
Msg-id 5360F23F.8030404@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Considerer Harmful Considered Harmful  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Responses Re: "Considerer Harmful Considered Harmful" categorized as Mostly Harmless  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/30/2014 02:35 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 01:27 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>>> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>>>> ... so let's stop using that phrase, OK?
>>>> http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html
>>>
>>> Shrug ... what I see there is a rant from a guy with no sense of humor.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> 'pfffft', I say.
>
> I wasn't sure if the whole article was a parody.
>
>


The rebuttal would be: "'Considered Harmful' Considered Harmful" 
Considered Harmful.

Don't you just love recursion?

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: includedir_internal headers are not self-contained
Next
From: "ktm@rice.edu"
Date:
Subject: Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes