On 04/23/2014 01:06 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 23 April 2014 20:55, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>>> Logical Decoding begs the questions "of what?". Changeset Extraction
>>> is a better name.
>>
>> Changeset Extraction sounds too geeky to me. Let me try some
>> simplification of it. Why "set"? We capture each change; whether
>> together they form a set doesn't matter much. Also, since the changes
>> we're talking about occur in the stored data, I propose we use "Data
>> Change" rather than "Changeset". Also, why "Extract"? We're not
>> extracting these changes after the fact -- rather we capture them as
>> they transit through the WAL system.
>>
>> So, I would propose "Data Change Capture".
>
> How about "Change Streaming" ?
I like that one.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
