Re: Failure upgrading PG 9.2 to 9.3 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: Failure upgrading PG 9.2 to 9.3
Date
Msg-id 53321D36.3030900@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Failure upgrading PG 9.2 to 9.3  (Sam Saffron <sam.saffron@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 03/25/2014 05:14 PM, Sam Saffron wrote:
> 9.2 is the problem instance, 9.3 is clean, I am able to do many
> upgrades without issues with the same script (which spawns a clean 9.3
> instance and then pg_upgrades to it.)


Alright that makes sense, though I am still unclear about the below from
your original post:

Selecting previously unselected package postgresql-9.2.
Unpacking postgresql-9.2 (from
.../postgresql-9.2_9.2.8-1.pgdg12.4+1_amd64.deb) ...
Processing triggers for postgresql-common ...
Setting up postgresql-client-9.2 (9.2.8-1.pgdg12.4+1) ...
Setting up postgresql-9.2 (9.2.8-1.pgdg12.4+1) ...

If the 9.2 instance was already there, why was 9.2 being installed? Is
it possible that it was installed over a running version?

>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sam Saffron
Date:
Subject: Re: Failure upgrading PG 9.2 to 9.3
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Trimming transaction logs after extended WAL archive failures