Hi,
On December 1, 2022 9:48:48 PM PST, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> On 2022-12-02 00:08:20 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Just the table-to-view hack. I'm not aware that there are any other
>>> cases, and it seems hard to credit that there ever will be any.
>
>> I can see some halfway credible scenarios. E.g. converting a view to a
>> matview, or a table into a partition. I kind of wonder if it's worth keeping
>> the change, just in case we do - it's not that easy to hit...
>
>I'd suggest putting in an assertion that the relkind isn't changing,
>instead.
Sounds like a plan. Will you do that when you remove the table-to-view hack?
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
