"Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org> writes:
> On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 23:08, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The first thing that comes to mind is that the thing is using SysV
>> semaphores as a substitute for spinlocks.
> It looks like a simple change in s_lock.h from
> #if defined(__i386__)
> to
> #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> Will be necessary for this platform.
Cool. I assume it still passes regression tests and so forth?
regards, tom lane
