Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1
Date
Msg-id 5307C1A7.7000809@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2/17/14, 7:31 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> But do you really want to keep that snapshot around long enough to
> copy the entire database?  I bet you don't: if the database is big,
> holding back xmin for long enough to copy the whole thing isn't likely
> to be fun.

I can confirm that this would be epic fail, at least for londiste. It takes about 3 weeks for a new copy of a ~2TB
database.There's no way that'd work with one snapshot. (Granted, copy performance in londiste is rather lackluster, but
still...)
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect                       jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Rate Limiting
Next
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: Storing the password in .pgpass file in an encrypted format