Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date
Msg-id 52aae11b-bfa5-6ccc-3b98-774f4836ab42@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/12/2018 19:55, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
>> reindex table CONCURRENTLY test;

By the way, does this syntax make sense?  I haven't seen a discussion on
this anywhere in the various threads.  I keep thinking that

    reindex concurrently table test;

would make more sense.  How about in combination with (verbose)?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: automatically assigning catalog toast oids
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Can we remove the #fdef UNUSED code from nbtxlog.c