Re: Create function prototype as part of PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Create function prototype as part of PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1
Date
Msg-id 52FF8BD8.7060301@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Create function prototype as part of PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Create function prototype as part of PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2/15/14, 10:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> On 1/15/14, 12:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Meh.  I don't think that extension authors are really going to appreciate
>>> changing from "thou shalt declare all thy functions" to "thou shalt
>>> declare none of them".
> 
>> This patch does no such thing.
> 
> Yes it does; people who fail to remove their manual externs will get
> Windows-only build failures (or at least warnings; it's not very clear
> which declaration will win).

The manual externs and the automatically provided ones are exactly the
same.  Why would that fail?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT