On 02/12/2014 08:30 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 02/12/2014 07:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So the early returns from currawong are interesting:
>
>> Great, that's what I was hoping to see - proper errors where we've
>> omitted things, not silent miscompilation.
>
> Well, before you get too optimistic about that benighted platform ...
> mastodon just reported in on this patch, and it's showing a *different*
> set of unresolved symbols than currawong is. None of them are a
> surprise exactly, but nonetheless, why didn't currawong find the
> postgres_fdw issues?
>
> It still seems there's something unexplained here.
Looks like currawong doesn't build postgres_fdw.
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
