On 02/02/2014 11:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> So I'm thinking my commit d2896a9ed, which introduced this mechanism,
> was poorly thought out and we should just remove the relcache invals
> as per the attached patch. Letting _bt_getroot() update the cached
> metapage at next use should be a lot cheaper than a full relcache
> rebuild for the index.
Looks good to me.
- Heikki
