Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date
Msg-id 52F1535A.5090300@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>
> Do you know about what it would cost?  Could official community funds 
> be used for it (it seems like something that is cheap, but which you 
> wouldn't want to be forgotten about some month.)
>
> Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place, MinGW is 
> still insanely slow.  Running "make" on already made PostgreSQL (so 
> there was nothing to actually do) takes 1.5 minutes.  And a make after 
> a "make clean" takes half an hour.  This is on an actual desktop, not 
> an AWS micro instance.  So doing a git bisect is just painful.  Is the 
> MSVC build faster?
>
>


Would have to check with the same build options (cassert and debug have 
major timing effects.) I agree it's not lightning fast like "make -j 4" 
on a decent linux box.

cheers

andrew






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christian Kruse
Date:
Subject: Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan