Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date
Msg-id 31632.1391554047@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place, MinGW is 
>> still insanely slow.  Running "make" on already made PostgreSQL (so 
>> there was nothing to actually do) takes 1.5 minutes.  And a make after 
>> a "make clean" takes half an hour.  This is on an actual desktop, not 
>> an AWS micro instance.  So doing a git bisect is just painful.  Is the 
>> MSVC build faster?

> Would have to check with the same build options (cassert and debug have 
> major timing effects.) I agree it's not lightning fast like "make -j 4" 
> on a decent linux box.

I wonder if ccache exists for Mingw.  That thing makes a huge difference
in the perceived build speed ...
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD