Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date
Msg-id 52F13CF6.4000403@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 02/04/2014 10:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> On 02/04/2014 09:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> My own opinion is that I've already wasted untold man-hours thanks to
>>> the random porting problems induced by Windows, a platform that I never
>>> have and never will care about personally.  I will *not* spend my own
>>> time doing tests that someone else could do.  If we can't get some
>>> effort contributed by someone who does use that platform, I'm personally
>>> prepared to declare the entire damn thing no longer supported.
>
>> Although that is obviously your prerogative it is important to remember
>> that Windows is easily the second most used version of PostgreSQL out
>> there (behind Linux).
>
> [ shrug... ]  If it's so widely used, why is it so hard to find somebody
> who's willing to put in some development effort for it?

Well, from what I have seen of the Windows world there is a fairly sharp 
demarcation between users and developers. So use does not necessarily 
mean developer knowledge.


>
>             regards, tom lane
>
>


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@gmail.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PQputCopyData dont signal error