(2014/01/22 22:26), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:32 AM, KONDO Mitsumasa
> <kondo.mitsumasa@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> OK, Kondo, please demonstrate benchmarks that show we have <1% impact
>>> from this change. Otherwise we may need a config parameter to allow
>>> the calculation.
>>
>> OK, testing DBT-2 now. However, error range of benchmark might be 1% higher.
>> So I show you detail HTML results.
>
> To see any impact from spinlock contention, I think you're pretty much
> going to need a machine with >32 cores, I think, and lots of
> concurrency. pgbench -S is probably a better test than DBT-2, because
> it leaves out all the writing, so percentage-wise more time will be
> spent doing things like updating the pgss hash table.
Oh, thanks to inform me. I think essential problem of my patch has bottle neck in
sqrt() function and other division caluculation. I will replcace sqrt() function
in math.h to more faster algorithm. And moving unneccessary part of caluculation
in LWlocks or other locks. It might take time to improvement, so please wait for
a while.
Regards,
--
Mitsumasa KONDO
NTT Open Source Software Center
