2013-11-28 09:55 keltezéssel, Michael Meskes írta:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:04:17AM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>>>> Well, technically, unspecified means NO SCROLL according to the SQL
>>>> standard. A lot of applications in ECPG are ported from other systems,
> That means by automatically adding a literal NO SCROLL to the command we obey
> standard, right? That's fine by me.
>
>>> behavior applies, but it might break existing apps that were unknowingly
>>> relying on a simple cursor being scrollable. OTOH any such app would be
>>> subject to breakage anyway as a result of planner changes, so it's hard to
>>> complain against this, as long as it's happening in a major version
>>> update.
> Ported applications might be in the same boat. I'm not sure if all other DBMSs
> stick with the standard if nothing is specified. So again, adding it might help
> make it clearer.
>
>> Anyway, is explicitly adding NO SCROLL the preferred solution for everyone?
> +1 from me.
Thanks, I will rework the patches this way.
>
> Michael
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de http://www.postgresql.at/
