On 11/19/2013 06:20 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2013-11-18 23:15:59 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Afaics it's likely a combination/interaction of bugs and fixes between:
>> * the initial HS code
>> * 5a031a5556ff83b8a9646892715d7fef415b83c3
>> * f44eedc3f0f347a856eea8590730769125964597
>
> Yes, the combination of those is guilty.
>
> Man, this is (to a good part my) bad.
>
>> But that'd mean nobody noticed it during 9.3's beta...
Ah, so this affected 9.3.0 as well?
Maybe it's worth it now to devise some automated replication testing?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
