On 16/10/13 11:51, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> On 11/10/13 17:33, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> also the name pgstattuple2, doesn't convince me... maybe you can use
>> pgstattuple() if you use a second argument (percentage of the sample)
>> to overload the function
>
> +1, that seems much nicer.
>
Oh - and if you produce a new version I'd be happy to review it (I guess
it will need to go in the next CF, given the discussion happening now).
Regards
Mark
