Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date
Msg-id 5260.1516221454@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks for the review.  Updated patch attached.

Looks OK to me.  Would it be worth annotating the added regression test
case with a comment that this once caused EPQ-related planning problems?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL crashes with SIGSEGV
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistent memory