Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I don't feel particularly comfortable committing a patch that
>> was clearly labeled as a rushed draft by its author.
>> Peter, where do you stand on this work?
> I would like to take another pass over
> WIP-tuplesort-memcontext-fix.patch, to be on the safe side. I'm
> currently up to my neck in parallel CREATE INDEX work, though, and
> would prefer to avoid context switching for a week or two, if
> possible. How time sensitive do you think this is?
Probably not very. It'd be nice to have it done by the next minor
releases, ie before 5-Feb ... but given that these bugs are years
old, missing that deadline would not be catastrophic.
> I'm not sure whether or not we should also apply this
> still-to-be-written 9.5 patch to 9.4 and 9.3, since those versions
> don't have grouping sets, and so cannot crash. ISTM that we should
> leave them alone, since tuplesort has had this problem forever.
+1. If the problem isn't known to be reproducible in those branches,
the risk of adding new bugs seems to outweigh any benefit.
regards, tom lane
